Flutter Vs. NativeScript – Which One Is Better And Why? - Moon Technolabs

It’s never easy to choose a framework to build an application that delivers exceptional native performance, powered by rich features, an understandable architecture, and in a manageable size. Both Flutter and NativeScript are excellent choices. However, depending on the situation, one may surpass the other. That’s why you need to know which one to select.

There’s one thing that a native app does better than a cross-platform app – it can take full advantage of the features of a device or its operating system. This particular functionality compels hundreds and thousands of businesses to stick to native applications. After all, it has the power to utilize the full potential of the device and its features.

Flutter is a new-age SDK that exudes modernism from every aspect. It’s a framework designed by Google that can offer numerous pre-fabricated widgets and modules needed in building native solutions.

NativeScript, on the other hand, is a framework based on JavaScript. It offers functionalities mimicking native applications combined with options for multiplatform compatibility. Developers create apps on this framework using TypeScript, Vue, and Angular.

As the business owner, you need to decide on a framework that’ll be future-proof or adaptive, costly, or pocket-friendly.

In some aspects, both frameworks share specific similarities. However, in terms of the system components, size, architecture, development costs, and other factors, both are different.

An overview of Flutter

This one is an open-source framework that utilizes a programming language called Dart. Google created both the framework and the language. Providers of flutter app development services describe it as an improved UI toolkit used in building cross-platform applications with just one codebase.

  • According to researchers from Statista, about 39% of the world’s population uses Flutter to build hybrid mobile applications.
  • 7.2% of the developer community uses Flutter because of the popularity of its tools and libraries.
  • Researchers from StackOverflow have evidence to prove that 68.8% of the development community loves using Flutter.

An overview of NativeScript

Just like Flutter, NativeScript is an open-source framework that a developer can use to build cross-platform mobile solutions for Android and iOS with JavaScript. It has the power to transpile one language to another, which, in turn, allows developers to create fully-native apps using VueJS, Angular, and TypeScript.

An overview of NativeScript - Moon Technolabs

  • Researchers from Statista have found that about 5% to 11% of all developers use NativeScript to build hybrid apps.
  • Researchers from npm stat say that the number of NativeScript downloads increased to 812,575 between 2019 and 2020.
  • 28% of all developers have been using NativeScript dedicatedly for over a year to build different cross-platform apps.

The advantages and disadvantages

Before you decide to go for nativescript app development from Moon Technolabs, you should check out these differences based on the advantages and disadvantages of both frameworks.

  • Advantages of Flutter

Hot-reloading

This feature reflects alterations immediately without losing the state of the app.

Rich widgets

It can provide rich widgets, and they adhere to the guidelines of Material Design and Cupertino.

Integration seamlessness

Code rewriting won’t be necessary as it can integrate with Objective C or Swift for iOS and Java for Android easily.

  • Disadvantages of Flutter

Plugins and tools

The tools and libraries of Flutter are impressive enough, but they aren’t as powerful as React Native.

UI

Vector graphics and animation support can be problematic, particularly in rendering plugins on time.

The platform of operation

You can’t use it to build apps for Android Auto, tvOS, watchOS, or CarPlay.

  • Advantages of NativeScript

Compatible with hybrid tech

NativeScript uses TypeScript, Angular, or JavaScript as they facilitate convenient data binding and more component reusability.

Programming language

It uses an XML-Esque-based markup language, just like HTML to develop apps loaded with customized features.

Native functionality

It can access the API of a native device through native components developed using native performance.

  • Disadvantages of NativeScript

Limitations with the UI

HTML and DOM don’t get too much support. As a result, developers have no other option but to learn to use the different components of the UI.

Native knowledge

Developers have to be aware of the APIs of Android and iOS, apart from native functionality, to access the hardware components of a device.

Slow testing

The native nature of an app built using NativeScript causes specific testing issues. You can test such an app appropriately only on an emulator or the device on which it’ll run.

1. The performance standards

Performance won’t always determine everything, especially if your project isn’t too complicated. However, if you’re going to build something large, you have to pay attention to this aspect.

The performance standards - Moon Technolabs

Flutter performance

Compared to its sworn rivals, flutter app development services will prove worthwhile. It doesn’t rely on a bridge to communicate with the native modules because it has native components available by default.

NativeScript performance

NativeScript doesn’t deliver a stellar performance, but it isn’t worth ignoring, either. Instead, it manages to stand at par with most of the other cross-platform app frameworks available right now.

2. The architecture

When you have to select a framework for your project, you must stick to the flexible ones to avoid strict enforcement of guidelines and architecture. Experts in programming always recommend treating a framework as a guide instead of methods or standards.

The architecture supported by Flutter

Flutter features a layered architecture. If you break down a simple app built using Flutter, you’ll find that it starts with a top-level root function followed by basic widgets and rendering layers. After that, you’ll find the animation gestures.

The architecture supported by NativeScript

If you resort to nativescript app development for your project, you’ll get an end-product that follows the MVVM or MVC architectural pattern. However, the framework primarily functions on CLI, plugins, and modules. Its structure contains several modules, and each plays a role in enabling a set of features.

3. App testing

Making an app work without glitches under continuous load and ever-increasing consumer expectations is a significant challenge. App developers conduct several tests to combat this problem. They ensure compliance with compatibility, UI standards, and usability through these tests.

Ease of testing on Flutter

Flutter can offer extensive support to a developer for automated testing as it uses Dart as the programming language. It has several testing features to inspect apps at the widget, unit, and integration level. Flutter also has detailed documentation associated with testing.

Also Read : What Does Flutter 2.8 Bring To The Table?

Ease of testing on NativeScript

After the release of NativeScript 2.5, it follows an exclusive QA workflow that augments the framework’s default testing facilities. It connects unit testing with the default CLI to allow developers to use various inspection tools, such as Mocha, QUnit, and Jasmine.

4. Complications of development

Flutter and NativeScript have all the official guidelines, documents, third-party libraries, open-source projects, and plugins developers need throughout the process of building an app.

Flutter for complex solutions

Flutter is still unsuitable for massive projects. Then again, for startups, Flutter can be a boon as it’s suitable for building excellent MVPs. You can use it if you wish to create prototypes faster. After that, you can experiment with them while reducing your expenses to check how your app idea performs in the real world.

NativeScript for complex solutions

Compared to most of the frameworks available right now, advanced or complex apps work smoothly with NativeScript and deliver high performance even when building an advanced solution. However, if you’re going to build a fully-packed complex application, you’ll need extra UI and XML support.

5. UX factors

User experience has been crucial since the dawn of the idea of mobile applications. Naturally, it will dictate your choice of framework. With better UX, you’ll build a base of customers loyal to your brand or product.

UX abilities of Flutter

Flutter always offers an excellent user experience with elements, simplified tools, and customized widgets. There’s a generational garbage collection feature that’s part of Dart, and it helps developers from a flutter app development company create UI frames for possibly temporary object codes.

UX abilities of NativeScript

Creating enterprise-level apps is one of the extra benefits of selecting this framework. Additionally, developers can customize the professional-level and free-of-charge UI elements explicitly. As all the features receive native functionality and native control support, NativeScript apps offer better performance and user experience.

Wrapping it up

Well, there are several other factors worth looking into, such as app size comparison, code maintainability, learning curve, and availability of developers. Unfortunately, it isn’t possible to include them all in this write-up.

Nevertheless, you should start looking for a flutter app development company if your project fulfills the following criteria.

  • You want to develop just one code with both backend and front-end functionalities.
  • You want to build a powerful yet smooth design.
  • You wish to create native apps with new-age cloud services and real-time databases.
  • You hope to create an MVP with on-demand features and reactive widgets.
  • You want to ensure a seamless process of development by integrating code magic for supporting Continuous Integration.

NativeScript should be your choice if your project fulfills the following criteria.

  • You want to leverage the abilities of your existing development team’s TypeScript, Angular, or Vue skills to build apps on native platforms.
  • You want to reuse your CocoaPods and Android SDKs exponentially to create extensible applications on native platforms.
  • You hope to use the power of community support from developers who even support NativeScript for NASDAQ.
  • You want to share one codebase between iOS and Android platforms to extend the app to the web.
  • You want to create an enterprise-level app with MVP-like functionalities and powerful native performance at a faster rate of development.

Based on the information provided here, you should be able to make the right choice. If you have other queries, consider researching the internet.

Frequently Asked Questions

The average fee of a Flutter developer ranges between $20 and $100/hour.
Flutter is relatively easy for a trained developer to learn, but NativeScript demands extensive learning as it constantly switches between TypeScript, Angular, and JavaScript.
Whether it's an app built using Flutter or NativeScript, maintenance is easy on both frameworks.

Let's Share it:

ceo image
Jayanti Katariya

At the core, Moon Technolabs is driven by the vision, sharpness and flourished under the leadership quality led by none other than the founder & CEO i.e, Mr. Jayanti Katariya. His simple-approach & never-give-up attitude is the virtue or rather aptitude that the entire team tries to grasp and follow. From client relations to business development, from industry updates to floor walking, he does everything in his power to provide support to the team.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Company Strength

  • 1200+ Projects Completed
  • 12+ Years of Experience
  • 600+ Global Customers
  • 200+ Development Staff
  • 72% Location we Serve
  • 32+ Specific Industry
Talk to our expert arrow

Corporate Video

corporate video

Our Clients

Recent Blogs

Call Us Now

OR
OR